A team of AI agents
that does the work for you.

Describe a job in one sentence — agents do it with real tools, and a separate AI checks every result.

Start for free Watch a mission

For teams of any size, from one person to an enterprise.

Free usage to try it · no card needed · See plans

xorviex.ai/dashboard/chat
Example run · the figures are illustrative
xorviex.ai/dashboard/missions
You

Every Monday at 9, check our five main competitors: pricing, new blog posts and social activity. Send me a one-page report in #marketing.

Missions / Marketing

Weekly Competitor Report

RunningScope 3/5every Monday 09:00 UTC
AgentsPlanNotesSupervisorsLogs
SW

Site Watcher

Monitoring

4.6
SM

Social Monitor

Research

Working
RW

Report Writer

Writing

Queued

Deliverable

Waiting for the audit

  • Slackposted in #marketing, PDF attached
  • Gmailsent to the marketing team
  • Google Sheets5 prices added to the log

Live tool calls

03scrape(competitor-a.example/blog)→ 3 new posts
04track-price(5 pricing pages)→ 1 change
05social-engagement(linkedin · 10 posts)→ 4.1% avg
06social-engagement(instagram · 10 posts)→ 2.7% avg
07bar-chart("engagement by competitor")→ chart
08create-pdf-report("Competitor report")→ 1 page
09slack-send-message(#marketing)→ sent

Activity

  • Created from Command Chat· 2 min ago
  • Planner assigned 3 agents · scope 3/5· 2 min ago
  • Supervisor is waiting for the first output
XCommand ChatHigh
Every Monday at 9, check our five main competitors: pricing, new blog posts and social activity. Send me a one-page report in #marketing.

Worked for 14 sec ›

Mission created and scheduled for Mondays. I planned 3 agents — Site Watcher, Social Monitor and Report Writer — and the report arrives in #marketing as a PDF.

Created missionscope 3/5

Weekly Competitor Report

every Monday 09:00 UTC → #marketing

create_mission · ok

Reply…

Model · High

From people
using it

In their own words — what they handed off, and what came back.

  • “I wasn't expecting it to handle the whole task end-to-end, but it actually did. I only had to step in a couple of times.”
    ECEthan C*****Founder
  • “The first few tasks were a bit of a learning curve, but once it understood what we needed, it became surprisingly useful.”
    MTMia T*****Co-founder
  • “What impressed me most is that I can give it the goal instead of explaining every single step.”
    OBOliver B*****CTO
  • “We started using Xorviex for a few repetitive ops tasks. It's now handling quite a bit more than we originally planned.”
    GSGrace S*****Head of Operations
  • “I was skeptical about another AI tool, honestly. After using it for a week, I started finding more things to give it.”
    JMJake M*****Founder
  • “The biggest difference for me is that I don't have to constantly check what it's doing. It gives me updates when it actually needs me.”
    SRSamantha R*****Founder
  • “Our team didn't immediately trust it with important work. After a few successful runs, that changed pretty quickly.”
    NFNathan F*****Engineering Lead
  • “It's not perfect, but it's much more capable than the AI tools we'd been using before.”
    IMIsabella M*****Product Manager
  • “I gave it a task that normally takes me a few hours to coordinate. Xorviex handled most of the work without me babysitting it.”
    PRPatrick R*****Operations Lead
  • “The interesting part isn't that it can automate things. It's that I can give it an objective and let it figure out how to get there.”
    CECharlotte E*****Startup Operator
  • “We've started using Xorviex for tasks that would normally sit on someone's backlog for days.”
    ASAaron S*****Co-founder
  • “I still review the important outputs, but I'm doing a lot less manual work than before.”
    VHVictoria H*****CEO
  • “The agent actually surprised me a few times by taking an approach I hadn't thought of.”
    LBLeo B*****Head of Growth
  • “We originally signed up to test it on one workflow. A week later we were using it for several different tasks.”
    ZPZoe P*****Founder
  • “For a small team, having something that can take a goal and work through the details is genuinely useful.”
    HSHarry S*****Agency Founder
  • “The proactive part is probably my favorite feature. It doesn't always wait for me to tell it the next obvious thing.”
    ATAbigail T*****Chief of Staff
  • “I like that I can give it a fairly vague objective and still get something useful back.”
    CWConnor W*****Consultant
  • “It's saved me a lot of small decisions during the week. That adds up more than I expected.”
    LCLily C*****Head of People
  • “We weren't sure how it would handle more complicated tasks, so we deliberately gave it one of our messier ones. The result was better than expected.”
    GFGeorge F*****Founder & CEO
  • “I wouldn't replace our whole stack with it, but there are definitely tasks I wouldn't want to do manually anymore.”
    EDEmma D*****Growth Lead
  • “Onboarding was pretty straightforward. The interesting part was seeing how quickly it started working with the context we gave it.”
    SKSamuel K*****Operations Director
  • “I gave it a process that normally involves a lot of back-and-forth. It managed most of it without needing constant instructions.”
    CHChloe H*****Process Lead
  • “I originally thought we'd mainly use it for research. It's ended up being useful for a much wider range of tasks.”
    WGWilliam G*****CEO
  • “The ROI wasn't obvious on day one. After using it consistently for a while, the amount of time we're getting back is pretty noticeable.”
    EGElla G*****Finance Lead
  • “The best thing about Xorviex is that I don't need to think about the process first. I can start with what I want done.”
    JWJack W*****Solo Founder

Same job,
less of you

We gave three tools the same brief: an agent that checks competitors' prices daily. Xorviex needed a message or two from us. With the other two, keeping it moving was our job.

Messages sent
9.5×less effort
than ChatGPT
vs ChatGPT
9.5×−89%
vs Claude
4.5×−78%
Messages sent
Xorviex1–2 messages
ChatGPT19 messages
Claude9 messages
Time to final report
3×faster
than ChatGPT
vs ChatGPT
3×−67%
vs Claude
2.8×−64%
Time to final report
Xorviex14 min
ChatGPT42 min
Claude39 min
AI cost of the job
13.8×cheaper
than Claude
vs ChatGPT
4.6×−78%
vs Claude
13.8×−93%
AI cost of the job
Xorviex1× times Xorviex's cost
ChatGPT4.6× times Xorviex's cost
Claude13.8× times Xorviex's cost

Results of the tests we ran with the same brief on each tool. Each tool picked its own competitors, so only the effort is compared, not the data. Messages include the brief and every answer to the tool's questions. Times are wall clock, not active work. The AI cost of the job was 13.8× lower with Xorviex than with Claude and 4.6× lower than with ChatGPT. Xorviex delivered the report to Storage, the other two to a local file.

One sentence in.
A checked result out.

No workflow to build. Describe the job: Xorviex designs the team, runs it, has a Supervisor check the work and delivers to your apps. On the right, the same team vibe-coded yourself — the errors, tools and checking are yours. Time and cost are our estimate: Xorviex at the pay-as-you-go price, by hand 4.5 to 7 times that.

With Xorviex

0 min· $0.00

Starting0.00M OU
You

Ad spend review

reading your sentence

First, in parallel

Ad Reader

Queued

Traffic Analyst

Queued

Then

Spend Analyst

Waiting on Ad Reader +1

Supervisor–Waiting

Then

Summary Writer

Waiting on Spend Analyst

Supervisor–Waiting

Result

Ad spend summary

PDF · 1 page

4 campaigns to cut · 3 to scale · every figure from the ad account

Slack

posted to #marketing

Gmail

emailed to you

Sheets

numbers appended

Without Xorviex

0 min· $0.00

Vibe-coding the agents yourself0 errors

Describe the next agent, or what broke…↑

Examples
+ anything you can describe

Checked
before it reaches you

A separate Supervisor scores every output from 0 to 5 against your goal and rules. Below the bar, it goes back with feedback. If it can't be audited, it waits for you.

Mission · Supervisors
  • 4.8

    Reporter

    Weekly pricing report

    Passed
  • 4.7

    Chart Maker

    12-week price chart

    Passed
  • 4.5

    Analyst

    Price trend summary

    Passed
  • 4.6

    Price Tracker

    Six competitor prices

    Passed
  • 4.9

    Publisher

    Summary post to #growth

    Passed

5 outputs reviewed · all delivered

4.8

Reporter · Weekly pricing report

Reviewed by a separate model

Checked against

On goalSources citedBrand voiceNo competitor names

All checks passed

Handed on — only reviewed work reaches you.

  • Independent supervisor

    A different model reviews the work than the one that did it.

  • Your rules, enforced

    Workspace memory and rules go into every plan and every audit.

  • Needs review

    Output that couldn't be audited waits for you instead of shipping.

  • Scope is a real budget

    Pick 1–5 before it runs; each level caps agents, turns and time.

  • Every call on the record

    Each tool call, its arguments and its result are logged on the mission.

  • Self-healing runs

    Failures are fingerprinted, re-run or escalated instead of dying quietly.

Connect
your tools

Connect an app once and any agent that needs it can act there. Keys are encrypted and never shown to the model.

All integrations→
  • Slack
  • Gmail
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • Notion
  • Outlook
  • Jira
  • Google Drive
  • Instagram
  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • YouTube
  • Google Sheets
  • Facebook
  • Ayrshare
  • TikTok
  • X
  • Microsoft Teams
  • Google Calendar
  • Google Docs
  • Asana
  • OneDrive
  • Meta Ads
  • Google Analytics
  • Search Console
  • Encrypted credentials

    Stored encrypted and decrypted only for the call that needs them.

  • No model keys to manage

    Every AI call runs on Xorviex's own account, counted against your plan.

  • Companies & workspaces

    A workspace per client or team, with shared company memory.

  • Two-factor by default

    Email codes from the first login; authenticator apps optional.

Questions
answered

Something we didn't cover — a job you're not sure it can take on, or how billing works for your team? Ask us directly.

  • A chatbot answers inside a chat window and stops. You still paste the answer into Slack, file the ticket and check the numbers. Xorviex plans a team for the job, the agents do the work with real tools and your connected apps, every message, email or commit is checked against your goal before it goes out, and a separate Supervisor reviews every result.

  • Those tools need you to draw every step, node and trigger in advance. With Xorviex you describe the outcome; it decides which agents the job needs and which tools each one uses, and adapts as it goes.

  • It suits them well. Each client gets its own workspace with its own memory, rules, files and connected apps, so reports, content drafts and competitor checks run per client and never mix. Every message or post is checked against that client's rules before it goes out. See the agency page for example jobs.

  • Yes. Describe the research, tracking or reporting job in a sentence. Agents search, read pages and public records, keep what they measure so later reports show a trend, and post the result to Slack, Notion or a Google Doc after a Supervisor has checked it.

  • Yes, in two ways. On a schedule: daily, weekly or any cron. Or on an event: a new GitHub issue or pull request, a Jira issue, a message in a Slack channel, a Sentry, Datadog or PagerDuty alert, or a request from any system that can call a URL. Each event starts one mission with that event as its input, up to a daily limit you set per trigger, and every run is reviewed by the Supervisor like a mission you asked for.

  • By the actual AI work your agents and the Supervisor do — we meter it in Operation Units (OU), and you see it as a share of your monthly usage. Before a mission starts you pick its scope from 1 to 5: a quick scope-1 mission uses about 1% of Starter's month, and a bigger scope uses more. Every mission shows what it used.

  • It depends on the scope you pick before it runs. A quick scope-1 research mission uses about 1% of the Starter plan's monthly usage — around 100 of them a month — while a scope-5 mission uses many times that. Command Chat asks for the scope before anything starts, so you decide how much each job may use.

  • Yes. Every new account starts with free usage for Command Chat and quick missions — no card needed. When it runs out, choose a plan or add credit; a mission that was running is paused, not lost, and continues where it stopped.

  • Every agent's output is reviewed by a separate model — not the one that did the work — against your goal and your workspace rules, and scored from 0 to 5. Work below the bar is sent back with feedback; anything that can't be audited is marked for your review instead of quietly shipping.

  • The failure is fingerprinted and grouped with earlier ones. On plans with active self-healing, a failure in the agent's run is re-run automatically; an outside problem such as a rate limit alerts you in Slack or Discord instead of retrying into it; and a failure that keeps coming back is escalated to you for review.

  • New AI work pauses until your allowance resets on your billing day, or you upgrade — the higher allowance applies straight away. Every AI call runs on Xorviex’s own account, so you never need an API key of your own.

  • No. Missions, workspace memory and agent output stay in your workspace and are never used for model training.

Hand off the work.
Keep the control.

Start with free usage — no card needed, and nothing is charged until you pick a plan. Have an access code? Enter it when you sign up. Plans from $99/month. See plans